How to Cite and Verify Google Ancestry Research (Tutorial)

How to cite and verify Google ancestry research tutorial.

I can’t stress how important it is to keep your research log. Document where you have been and what you have found. Please write it down even when you haven’t found anything in your family. Good records become valuable by incorrectly analyzing your research and giving other researchers a trail to follow.

Cite and Verify Sources for Google Ancestry Research
Table of Contents

The log can include, but is not limited to, the following:

  • Search queries (the ones that work and don’t work),
  • Who you have talked to and the information provided,
  • Information you have found and citations,
  • The questions you still seek answers to,
  • Thoughts of where to research,
  • The answers you have found, and
  • Ideas and assumptions you are making and why.

Keep a to-do list—a plan for what research you seek to perform. Organize the plan so the most critical research gets done first. Often, when you focus on top priority research, many other items on your list are also completed.

Group your to-do items by the source you will use to conduct research.

Create a “future research” file. As you conduct your focused research, you will always come up with ideas for research you want to conduct outside the focus of your current line of inquiry. Record it—whether it’s an idea, a paragraph, a printed document, a photocopy, or whatever else—put it in the file, and forget about it until you are done with the task. You can then go through the file at a later date, organize your notes, and start the next task. Don’t be surprised if you begin doubling your accomplishments.

[Return to Article TOC]

Tips for Searching Online

Searching online presents many of the most challenging issues when it comes to verifying sources. The following are a few of the lessons I have learned from searching online:

  • Search for the source. It would be nice if all Web resources included a source. Whenever you find a record on the Web that relates you to your research of an individual or family, look for a source of the data. This can be in the form of source citations and references (often denoted as footnotes at the bottom of the page or the end of the publication), notes or comments, or an “about this database” section for websites like Ancestry.com. You could also send an email to the author or contributor and politely ask for source citations.
  • Seek to find the referenced source. If the website or database you are using does not have digital images of the actual source, you can search to find the source references. For example, if the source of information is a genealogy or history book, look for a library in the area you are searching with a copy that is willing to provide photocopies. Expect a small fee. If the source is a microfilm record, you will most likely be able to secure the original from your local family history center, where the film can be borrowed and viewed.
  • View the original material online. There is a growing trend of many online databases to access scanned images of original documents. Many Internet resources have been copied, abstracted, transcribed or summarized from previously existing sources. Understanding the difference between these different sources will help you best assess how to verify the information you find.
  • Use primary sources when possible. Primary sources were created at or close to the time of the event by someone with personal knowledge of the event (for example, a birth date provided by the family doctor for the birth certificate). Primary evidence usually carries more weight than secondary evidence.
  • Know the power of originals. If the record you are seeing is a photocopy, digital copy, or microfilm copy of the original source, it is likely to be a valid representation.
  • Know the limitations of compiled records. Compiled records, including abstracts, transcriptions, indexes and published family histories, are more likely to have missing information or transcription errors. If you find these records, it’s in your best interest to track down the original sources.
  • Think about the possible source. When you find information that doesn’t provide you a source for the database or website, ask yourself what kind of record could have supplied the information. For example, if it’s exact date of birth, then the source is most likely a birth certificate or tombstone inscription. It may have come from a census or marriage record if it is an approximate year of birth.
  • Use software to aid your individual and family research. To help me keep track of my research. I use software like RootsMagic, Family Tree Maker, Legacy or an online database like FamilySearch to keep me organized. Use the “sanity checks” built into these programs. These programs are designed for genealogists to help them research and accurately record what they find. The software has what I refer to as “sanity checks” to help guide you and stay focused on your research. The exact name of this feature may vary from one program to another, but all the better programs can find suspicious data within a database. These built-in quality checks or sanity checks help you quickly identify questionable data, such as very young girls or older women giving birth. When your software identifies such data, examine the evidence closely. As a writer, I appreciate these features in my individual and family narrative research.

Whether the source provides good, limited, or no information— write it down. Citing sources gives credibility to your research, helps others understand where you have been, and aids during your analysis.

[Return to Article TOC]

Cite and Verify Sources

I was given copies of some family history information for Christmas one year by my parents that they had received from someone else. When I started writing about specific individuals and families in the research, I pulled out the information.

As I reviewed the materials, I found out that the family I was most interested in had ended in the late 1700s in North Carolina. I began becoming familiar with the line and finally decided that I would like to see if I could extend it. Within a few weeks of research, I cracked the puzzle and started expanding on the research and building a writing and history profile. Over two years, I extended the research by several generations. I had carefully documented my research and was quite proud of what I had done.

On one of my writing and history field trips, I made arrangements to visit a distant cousin and collaborate my findings of this line with hers. Within two minutes of looking at my research, she told me that the person from whom I began my research was not the right person. With further discussion, she explained that the person I had listed was, in fact, in England at the time I had her marrying her husband in North Carolina. She didn’t arrive in America for another 10 years.

Where had I gone wrong with my history research?

I should have taken the time to confirm the information that I had been given. I just assumed it was correct. There was no documentation. That assumption was a costly but valuable error on my part. I learned the value of analysis and hoped I would not make that mistake again.

What exactly is analysis with regards to individual and family research?

It divides information into its six parts: who, what, when, where, why and how. Each of the six parts can be applied to every document or source that you acquire.

To quote Sir Conan Doyle, writing as Sherlock Holmes, from the book, The Adventure of the Beryl Coronet, “When you eliminate the impossible, whatever you have left, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.” Let’s look at what each of the six parts means for you as a researcher.

  • Who. You can define the who before you start your search by asking, “Who created the source?”
  • What. What do you want to know? What information does the source provide?
  • Where. “Where” is probably the most critical fact after “who.” Are the records in national, state, county, parish, town or precinct records? Where did you find the records?
  • When. Determine a time frame or period so you know where to search for records.
  • Why. Why was the source created? Why did your individual emigrate from Germany to the United States? Why did they move from Illinois to Wyoming? Why are there so many German (or Irish or Italian) people in the area?
  • How. How does the information agree or conflict with information from other sources? How do I answer all these questions? How do I find the records I need?

As you analyze your data, you will make good decisions about their value and accuracy. It’s not necessary to write the answers to the above questions but writing your conclusions will help to clarify your thinking and reveal any inconsistencies.

Take time to review your individual and family history research carefully

Look at the sources. What is the artifact? What documents did you use? What books did you use? To whom did you speak?

Look at information gathered from oral or recorded histories. Review previous research. Correlate unrelated information by categorizing it. Is it primary information (participant, eyewitness), or is it secondary (non-participant)?

Look closely at the evidence

What does the evidence say to you? How relevant is the information to your research? Does it provide direct answers to the questions you are researching? Does it provide indirect answers that help answer the question but do not stand alone? Does it provide negative answers or no answers at all? Is there information missing? What do you see that you didn’t see before? New insights? Different conclusion? Same answer? Different clues?

Ask for documentation

Never be shy about asking for documentation from another researcher when they have shared information with you. Again, without the paper records in hand, nothing is proven.

Always verify your individual and family research

There is never a time when you should not verify the information you have received. You can go to almost any Internet search engine today and within a few minutes find hundreds of questionable “facts.” I’ve seen the exact birth recorded in Florida in the 1700s and Kansas in the 1800s. I’ve seen records of mothers who supposedly gave birth to children at the age of 5, as well as 22-year-old grandfathers. It’s frustrating.

Through the years, I have found critical errors in the information I downloaded. It often appears that researchers wanted so desperately to extend the line or make a connection that they jumped to conclusions in their research, which caused other researchers to research the wrong individual or family lines. Often the answers they were looking for were right before their eyes.

The following are a few examples of experiences other researchers have shared with me about the value of verifying information:

  • Using another person’s research with verifying. “I verify everything for myself. I once used someone else’s info, and there was a huge mistake that cost me about a year of work.”
  • Wrong certificate information. “Great-granddad’s marriage certificate had wrong occupation details on it, which caused me no end of problems with my searching.”
  • Family myths. “Family myths are just that, myths, unless you check and double-check. I was led to believe that my father’s family was from Suffolk County in England. Everyone swore that this was right. It took me five years and a trip to Utah to find out that they were not right. The family was from the county of Essex.”
  • Be accurate. “I do not automatically accept a version of research from another person — I check everything out because people sometimes will create their individual and family to fit their own conceptions. When creating a Family story, make it a masterpiece of accuracy. Inaccurate information will lead you away from where you want to go.”
  • Make no assumptions. “The Family has always stated that my mother’s family was from Germany because of the heavy accent. However, in North Carolina, an Irish or Scottish accent could also have been considered ‘heavy,’ as could Welsh. Don’t discount anything until you’ve proved it can’t be.”
  • Do not assume something is correct. This is a real-time waster. I spent a lot of time seeking my great-grandfather, who supposedly died in South Africa when in reality, he died at his home in Scotland. I have many examples of wasting time — now I’m almost too skeptical. Nothing should be taken at face value. Humans make errors.”
  • Don’t believe everything you read; adopt a ‘show-me attitude. I’d heard for years that there was a fire in Martin County (N.C.) courthouse, and all records were destroyed. I visited the courthouse and was informed that wasn’t the case. Yes, there had been a small fire that damaged a few land records, but that was it.”

[Return to Article TOC]

Tips for Documenting Your Sources

Do it right the first time! Whether the source is a newspaper, journal, court record, personal interview, letter or church record, write everything down while still having the source in your hands.

The following are a few of the lessons I’ve learned about the value of documenting your sources:

Sources you can rely on

No one has a perfect memory, and some sources will have worse memories than others. The only source you can rely on is an “official” one: birth, marriage, death documents and other confirmable databases and indices. Even if the information came from a relative, list the person’s name. You want to stay as accurate as possible and leave a clear trail for others to follow. Not only will you know you have proof of your information, but others you share the information with will know it is factual, not just speculation.

Sources establish credibility

Many genealogists pointed out that unless we can tell others where we obtain the information, all we are sharing is our opinion. Citing sources is essential to establishing credibility. If we have done an excellent job with our research, we can give others the ability to broaden and build upon the research already done and not have the same work rechecked repeatedly.

Write legibly

If you handwrite any information, write legibly. It doesn’t pay to hurry and then not be able to read your handwriting later. I always try to get a photocopy or a photo of the vital information I am capturing and then enter it into my genealogical program or record database.

Checking sources allows for verification

Checking sources allows you to verify spelling and dating and to report variations. It also leads to more information. Relying on the expertise of others helps save time and energy. Create and maintain a record of what resource was checked so that you don’t waste time later. Likewise, some sources (books, newspapers and so on) might be found at only a few locations. Include where these were found in case you need to clean them again.

How valuable is your time?

Genealogists have told experiences where they tried to pick up the trail of research from undocumented records and spent weeks, months or even years searching for the next clue, only to find out that the data they had was incorrect.

Six elements of a sound source citation

The six elements of a good source citation include author, title, publisher’s name and location, publication date, location of the source and identifying information (library or archive where you found the info and its call number) and specific information for the piece of data you found (page number, line number, and so on).

[Return to Article TOC]

How to Cite and Verify Online Sources

The following are examples of how to cite online resources. When possible, I include a URL address plus a physical address because email addresses tend to change. URLs also change over time, yet I do have the original source.

Scanned Image File

  • Description: Birth Certificate
  • Individual: Mary Schreiber
  • Details: Certificate # 352-993
  • Date: 20 Oct 1938
  • Location: Littleton Colorado
  • Scan Date: 24 Nov 2005
  • Image File Name: SCHREIBER-Mary Schreiber Birth Certificate.tif
  • Scanned by: Author Schreiber, Schreiber.Author@msn.com, Littleton, Colorado
  • Image Editing: Digitally retouched by Author Schreiber, Littleton Colorado, January 2006 to provide color correction to faded document. Data was not changed.
  • Formatted: Birth certificate of Mary Schreiber, Littleton, Arapahoe County, Colorado, Certificate # 352-993, 30 Oct 1938, Image File: SCHREIBER-Mary Schreiber Birth Certificate.tif, scanned by Author Schreiber, [Schreiber.Author@msn.com, Littleton, Colorado], 20 November 2005. [Image has been digitally retouched by Author Schreiber, Littleton, Colorado, January 2006 to provide color correction to faded document. Data was not changed.]

Email Message

  • Author: Igor Pleve
  • Email Address: igor@mt.ru
  • Message Title: 1857 Schondorf Census-Wagner Surname
  • Description of Email: Message to Author Schreiber
  • Date: 6 April 2004
  • Specific Location: Electronic file in possession of Author Schreiber
  • Detail: Description of 1857 Census, Schondorf, Russia with Wagner Surname
  • Form Used and Repository: Located in Wagner Surname Folder, Igor Pleve Correspondence, File Name Igor Pleve-1857 Shondorf Census-Wagner Surname
  • Formatted: Igor Pleve [igor@mt.ru], “1857 Shondorf Census-Wagner Surname,” Message to Author Schreiber, 6 April 2004, Electronic file in possession of Author Schreiber. [Description of 1857 Census, Schondorf, Russia with Wagner Surname, Located in Wagner Surname Folder>Igor Pleve Correspondence>File Name Igor Pleve-1857 Shondorf Census-Wagner Surname.]

Message Board

  • Author: George Schreiber
  • Email Address: gwsabc1023@hello.net
  • Message Title: Robert Schreiber 1789 White Hall, Virginia
  • Date: 23 March 2006
  • Message URL: http://www.Genealogy.com/Genealogy/14_after.html?priority=0001000
  • Description: Schreiber Family in Whitehall, Albemarle County, Virginia. Lineage of Family and children from 1750 to 1804
  • Form Used and Repository: Copy downloaded and in possession of Author Schreiber, Located in Schreiber surname Folder>Message Board-Schreiber>George Schreiber 1750-1804
  • Formatted: George Schreiber [gwsabc1023@hello.net], Robert Schreiber 1789 White Hall, Virginia, 23 March 2006 [http://www.Genealogy.com/Genealogy/17_after.html?priority=000100], Robert Schreiber Family in Whitehall, Albemarle County, Virginia, Lineage of Family and children from 1750 to 1804], Copy downloaded and in possession of Author Schreiber, Located in Schreiber Surname Folder>Message Board-Schreiber>Robert Schreiber 1750-1804.

Website file

  • Description: Schreiber Family Organization
  • Individual: Family line of Robert Schreiber
  • Website Address: http://www.SchreiberFamily.org/
  • Date: 29 June 2006
  • E. Detail: Downloaded Robert Schreiber genealogy files. Reviewed data and includes detail and sources. Compiled by Marilyn Schreiber
  • Form Used and Repository: Copy in possession of Author Schreiber, Located in Schreiber Surname Folder>Genealogy>Robert Schreiber
  • Formatted: Schreiber line of Robert Schreiber, Schreiber Family Organization, June 29, 2006 [Downloaded Robert Schreiber genealogy, Reviewed data and includes detail and sources, Compiled by Marilyn Schreiber], Copy in possession of Author Schreiber, Located in Schreiber Surname Folder>Genealogy>Robert Schreiber.

[Return to Article TOC]

How to Cite and Verify Published Resources

The following are examples of how to cite published resources.

Book

  • Author: Robert Anderson
  • Title: Bonds of Henrico County, Virginia, 1782-1853
  • Publication Facts (place of publication, name of publisher, year): Baltimore Maryland, Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc, 1984
  • Page Number: 133
  • Formatted: Robert Anderson, Marriage Bonds of Henrico County, Virginia, 1782-1853, (Baltimore Maryland, Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc, 1984) p. 133.

Article

  • Author: A. Marten
  • Title of the Article: The Influence of the Huguenots
  • Name of Periodical: The Huguenot
  • Publication Facts (place of publication, name of publisher): Vallejo, California, The Huguenot Society
  • Volume: 10
  • Month/Season and Year: 1939-41
  • Page Numbers: 39-45
  • Formatted: A. Marten, “The Influence of the Huguenots.” The Huguenot (Vallejo, California, The Huguenot Society), Vol. 10 (1939-41), pp. 39-45.

Newspaper

  • Title of Article: George Schreiber Wins Prize
  • Place of Publication: Provo, Utah
  • Name of Newspaper: Provo Daily Herald
  • Date of Publication: 15 December 1929
  • Page Number: 1
  • Column Number: 2
  • Formatted: George Schreiber, Provo, Utah, Provo Daily Herald, 15 December 1929, p. 1, column 2.

[Return to Article TOC]

How to Cite and Verify Unpublished Sources

The following are examples of how to cite unpublished resources.

Personal Letter

  • Author: Mary Schreiber
  • Description of the Letter: Letter to Author Schreiber
  • Date: 12 July 1979
  • Detail: Letter from Mary Schreiber to Author Schreiber. Topic of the letter was a trip to Florida.
  • Specific Location: Original handwritten letter in possession of Author Schreiber
  • Form Used and Repository: Handwritten
  • Formatted: Mary Schreiber, Letter to Author Schreiber, 12 July 1979. [Original handwritten letter in possession of Author Schreiber. Topic of the letter was a trip to Florida.]

Oral Interview

  • Title of Notes or Tape: An oral interview with Nathaniel Schreiber
  • Date of Interview: 14 May 2009
  • Interviewer: Author Schreiber
  • Present Owner’s Name and Address: Recording owned by Author Schreiber, New York, New York
  • Form Used and Location: Nathaniel Schreiber was living in Provo, Utah
  • Place of Interview: Provo, Utah
  • Evaluation Information: Interview focused on experiences as Construction Worker, Provo, Utah, from 1945-1976
  • Formatted: “Oral interview with Nathaniel Schreiber,” 14 May 2009, by Author Schreiber, recording owned by Author Schreiber, New York, New York, Nathaniel was living in Provo, Utah, Interview took place in Provo, Utah, the interview focused on experiences as a construction worker in Provo, Utah from 1945to 1976.

Photograph

  • Description: Photograph of John Schreiber
  • Date of Picture: Circa 1900
  • Location: Provo, Utah
  • Taken by: George Edward Anderson
  • Specific Location: Glass plates in possession of Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
  • Formatted: Photograph of John Schreiber, circa 1900, Provo, Utah, taken by George Edward Anderson, glass plates in possession of Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.

Unpublished Document

  • Descriptive Title of Document: Personal History of John Schreiber
  • Significant Dates or Numbers: Written Circa 1935
  • Page Numbers or Other Specific Designation: Original owned by Daughters of Utah Pioneers, Provo, Utah
  • Other Detail: 4-page history written by daughter Mary Schreiber Smith
  • Location and Form of Record: Copy received and in possession of Author Schreiber, Littleton, Colorado, 7 July 1997
  • Formatted: “Personal History of John Schreiber,” circa 1935, 4 pages, written by daughter Mary Schreiber Smith, Copy received from Daughters of Utah Pioneers, Provo, Utah, 7 July 1997, in possession of Author Schreiber, Littleton, Colorado.

[Return to Article TOC]

Online Citation Tools

There are several online tools you can also use to assist in generating citations. Do a Google search on the name to find the tools, which are as follows:

  • Noodletools. Using their template, you can create a citation for different types of content.
  • Open Attribute. This tool allows you to cite images you find on the Web.
  • Son of Citation Machine. You can paste the ISBN or name of the book in the space provided and will receive a citation, and you can also create a citation.
  • WorldCat. When you find an item that you can use, you can look up the citation by clicking on the artifacts detail page’s top-right that says “Cite/Export” and will receive a citation. If you handwrite any information, write legibly. It doesn’t pay to hurry and then not be able to read your handwriting later. I try to always get a photocopy or a photo of the key information I am capturing and then enter it into my genealogical program or record database.

Checking sources allows for verification

Checking sources allows you to verify spelling and dating and to report variations. It also leads to more information. Relying on the expertise of others helps save time and energy. Create and maintain a record of what resource was checked so that you don’t waste time later. Likewise, some sources (books, newspapers and so on) might be found at only a few locations. Include where these were found in case you need to clean them again.

How valuable is your time?

Genealogists have told experiences where they tried to pick up the trail of research from undocumented records and spent weeks, months or even years searching for the next clue, only to find out that the data they had was incorrect.

Six elements of a sound source citation

The six elements of a good source citation include author, title, publisher’s name and location, publication date, location of the source and identifying information (library or archive where you found the info and its call number) and specific information for the piece of data you found (page number, line number, and so on).

[Return to Article TOC]

Additional Google Articles on BeginMyStory.com

The following are other articles you may enjoy to help you Google your ancestry.

[Return to Article TOC]